The Barrister's Toolbox
    • About
    • Have a Question?
  • Home
  • richcooklaw.com

/

Tumblr

/

Linkedin

The Barrister’s Toolbox

Category: Trial Advocacy

  • Motion in Limine: An Effective Pretrial Tool and Weapon (Part 2)

    Here are some additional topics to consider:               Unnecessary Medical Treatment. You should preclude or prohibit the defense counsel from alleging or arguing that plaintiff’s accident-related medical expenses are unnecessary or unreasonable.  All damages directly attributable to the wrong are recoverable by the victim.  The law also typically allows an injured plaintiff to recover reasonable →

    Trial Advocacy

    /

    Evidence, Rules of evidence

    /

    Mar 15, 2012
  • Strategies for the Cross-Examination of Experts

    In my last post, I discussed what a trial attorney can do to prepare for the cross-examination of an adverse expert. Below are some strategies that can be used in successfully cross-examining an adverse expert witness: 1. Favorable Evidence: One tactic that should not be ignored is using the opposing party’s expert to concede to →

    cross-examination, depositions, Evidence, Trial Advocacy

    /

    /

    Mar 7, 2012
  • Cross-Examination of Experts: Where to Start.

    Where do you start with your preparation to cross-examine an expert? The following is a list of areas to review: 1. The Expert’s Curriculum Vita: You should thoroughly review the expert’s c.v. Expert’s will exaggerate and even make up credentials. In a criminal case I was defending the State’s expert, an environmental specialist, claimed he →

    cross-examination, depositions, Evidence, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Cross-examination, Expert Witness

    /

    Feb 27, 2012
  • Trial Work: Variety is the Spice of Life.

    I have practiced nearly 30 years. I have not found it boring and have loved doing it. I have been blessed with a variety of cases and have not been afraid to push my boundaries a little from time-to-time. I have worked as a federal law clerk, state prosecutor, federal prosecutor, insurance defense attorney, criminal defense attorney →

    Trial Advocacy

    /

    Trial Work

    /

    Feb 22, 2012
  • Fireside Reading for the Trial Lawyer

    The next best thing to being in court is reading about it. The following is a list of books I believe will help you become a better trial attorney: 1.Polarizing the Case: Exposing and Defeating the Malingering Myth by Rick Friedman ;- this book provides an innovative approach to trying cases. Too often we allow →

    Trial Advocacy

    /

    advocacy, How-to-Books

    /

    Feb 21, 2012
  • The Greatest Rule of Cross Examination – Always ask a leading question!

    Alright you are getting ready to do your first cross-examination and you wonder what is the most important rule to being successful? It is simply this “Always ask leading questions that provide information supportive of you case.” You ask, “How can that be?” That’s too simple! The rule is easy to announce, but it is →

    cross-examination

    /

    Cross-examination; Frank Oliver; leading questions

    /

    Feb 11, 2012
  • Solo Practice – How Can I Compete?

    You are in a small firm or maybe even a solo practitioner and you are trying to keep up with a large law firm and their army of attorneys. What do you do? Well you could seek out a co-counsel arrangement with a more experienced attorney. You should not just turn over the case to →

    Trial Advocacy

    /

    American Bar Association, Trial Lawyers Association

    /

    Feb 9, 2012
  • Cross Examination: Why Pigs Get Fat & Hogs Get Slaughtered

    Cross-examination is often considered by many to be an art. When it comes to strategy, sometimes all you need is a little common sense. We all have heard the old saying, “Pigs get fat and hogs get slaughtered”, but what’s that got to do with cross-examination? Greed can be a vice and a weakness even →

    cross-examination, Trial Advocacy

    /

    /

    Jan 31, 2012
  • For the Record: Offers to Prove… Do They Make a Difference?

    You appear for your final pretrial conference and after a short discussion or perhaps with no hearing, the Court grants your opponent’s motion in limine and excludes evidence or testimony essential to your client’s case.  Now what do you do? Well, your starting point for an answer to this dilemma is Rule 103 of the Federal →

    Evidence, Trial Advocacy, Uncategorized

    /

    /

    Jan 30, 2012
  • Zingers: The power of the “one-liner” in communicating with jurors

    There is nothing more powerful in terms of capturing someone’s attention and imbedding your message in their brain than a good one-liner or as I like to call them, a “zinger”. A “zinger” is described as “a surprising or unusually pointed or telling remark.” In today’s modern fast paced world, speechwriters and politicians often work →

    cross-examination, Trial Advocacy

    /

    /

    Jan 24, 2012
  • Analogies: The power of parables and fables

    Want the jury to remember the key points of your closing argument? Having trouble making a point of law clear? The answer is to find a good analogy or anecdote to make your point. Some of the best teachers I had were those who used analogies to drive a point home. Jesus parables such as →

    Trial Advocacy

    /

    Parables; analogies; fables; storytelling; closing arguments

    /

    Jan 15, 2012
  • Jury selection in ten minutes or less… Can it be done effectively?

    The time allowed for jury selection today is typically very brief compared to the time allotted years ago to attorneys. One article that I recently read by Attorney Karen Koehler provided an interesting and effective approach to dealing with limited time for questioning potential jurors. This is what she said to a panel of prospective →

    Jury Selection, Trial Advocacy

    /

    /

    Jan 5, 2012
  • Refreshing Recollection vs. Past Recollection Recorded

    Refreshing Recollection. A client needs to be thoroughly familiarized with what it means to forget as opposed to not knowing something. If one says, “I don’t know,” something, that means it was never in their brain. “I don’t remember,” on the other hand, means that the information was once in their brain, but cannot be →

    depositions, Evidence, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Evidence; Rule 612; Rule 803(5); Refreshing Recollection;Past Recollection Recorded

    /

    Oct 4, 2011
  • How to Avoid Bad Questions and Answers

    Helping your client refresh their memory regarding facts pertinent to the case is just the beginning of your job in preparing your client to testify at their deposition. You also need prepare your client for problem areas of questioning. The following is a list of problem questions and how to deal with them during the →

    depositions, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Depositions, witness preparation

    /

    Oct 2, 2011
  • Deposition Preparation Begins Long Before the Deposition

    An important aspect of your case is your client’s deposition. A case’s value turns on the credibility and likeability of your client. As a former insurance defense attorney, the most important aspect to the evaluation of a case’s value was the deposition of the Plaintiff. Oftentimes, insurance companies are reluctant to make any significant offers →

    Trial Advocacy

    /

    Depositions, witness preparatio

    /

    Sep 3, 2011
  • When is the “Truth” Wrong?

    When is the truth wrong? This issue comes up often during the course of a trial. A witness testifies to a fact which is contrary to your side of the case, or it contradicts other evidence. A question arises, is the witness being truthful? Why is he “lying”? The more important question to ask is: →

    cross-examination, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Cross-examination; lying; truth

    /

    Aug 31, 2011
  • iPad App doubles as a Trial Notebook

    I was looking for a program that could emulate the structure of my file system I use for jury trials. I looked at several programs that were touted as the answer for use on my new iPad 2 I received for my birthday. I looked at all the Apple App World had to offer to →

    computer, Trial Advocacy

    /

    /

    Aug 21, 2011
  • The Silent Cross-Examination… When nothing is better.

    Nothing is more thrilling than conducting a good cross-examination of an adverse witness. The attorney through a series of leading questions wrangles  concessions and makes his own case through a line of short and concise rhetorical questions that lead to an undeniable conclusion in favor of one’s client.  However, there are times when no cross-examination is the best course of →

    cross-examination, Evidence, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Art of Cross Examination, Cross-examination, Law

    /

    Aug 17, 2011
  • Jury Selection-What’s the Goal?

    Of all the areas of trial work, this is probably the most difficult and important task that confronts a courtroom attorney. I have seen many different approaches used in questioning and selecting a jury. Your time is limited and the stakes are high. If you “guess’ incorrectly you can lose your case before it even →

    Jury Selection, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Jury, Voir dire

    /

    Aug 15, 2011
  • Mastering the Rules of Evidence: Is it really important?

    Early in my career, the “rules” of evidence were derived by reading case-law and the handful of statutes that addressed privilege and competence. If you wanted to know the “rules”, you had to research and read case-law. The only ready compendium were books like Graham’s Handbook on Federal Evidence. Today, litigators in every state and →

    Evidence, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Case law, Evidence (law), Jury trial, Law, Lawbox, Lawyer, Legal Information, Rules of evidence, United States

    /

    Aug 12, 2011
Previous Page
1 2 3 4 5
Next Page

Rich Cook has been practicing law for over 40 years and has been recognized by his peers for his contributions to the development of personal injury law and trial advocacy in the State of Indiana.

Since entering private practice, Rich has handled a wide range of matters involving claims of personal injury, wrongful death, automobile collisions, medical malpractice, product liability, job site injuries, insurance disputes, breach of contract, defamation, sexual harassment claims, civil rights claims, class actions, and construction site injuries.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
 

Loading Comments...
 

    • Subscribe Subscribed
      • The Barrister's Toolbox
      • Join 104 other subscribers
      • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
      • The Barrister's Toolbox
      • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Sign up
      • Log in
      • Report this content
      • View site in Reader
      • Manage subscriptions
      • Collapse this bar