The Barrister's Toolbox
    • About
    • Have a Question?
  • Home
  • richcooklaw.com

/

Tumblr

/

Linkedin

The Barrister’s Toolbox

Tag: Rules of evidence

  • Impeccable Impeachment and the Use of Prior Convictions

    “Trust is not simply a matter of truthfulness, or even constancy. It is also a matter of amity and goodwill. We trust those who have our best interests at heart, and mistrust those who seem deaf to our concerns.”   Gary Hamel What are the limitations on the use of prior convictions in challenging a witness’s →

    cross-examination, dos and don’ts, Evidence, rule 403, Rules of Evidence, Uncategorized

    /

    impeachment, Juvenile Convictions, Opening the door, prior convictions, rule 403, Rule 609, Rules of evidence

    /

    Sep 26, 2017
  • Limiting the Damage

    So you lose an evidentiary argument and the court allows some potentially prejudicial evidence to be presented for some narrow purpose such as bias, impeachment or to show intent, similar plan, motive or scheme.  So what should you do?   Indiana follows “the rule of multiple admissibility” endorsed by the evidence treatises of both Whitmore →

    Evidence, exclusion of witnesses, Rule 105, rule 403, Rules of Evidence, Trial Advocacy, Uncategorized

    /

    Evidence, Federal Rules of Evidence, juries, jurors, Motion in limine, Rules of evidence, Trial, trial advocacy, Trial Strategy

    /

    Jun 28, 2017
  • Motion in Limine: An Effective Pretrial Tool and Weapon – Wrongful Death & Remarriage (Part 6)

    The defense oftentimes wants to muddy the waters and misdirect or sway the jury away from a person’s cause with information that is irrelevant or unfairly prejudicial. Wrongful death cases are no exception and remarriage is one of those topics.  Fortunately, Indiana court’s have joined the majority of jurisdictions which have prohibited such tactics by →

    Trial Advocacy

    /

    advocacy, Evidence, girlfriend, husband, Motions in Limine, relevancy, Remarriage, Rule 402, rule 403, Rules of evidence, spouse, Trial, wife, wrongful death

    /

    Apr 29, 2016
  • What to Do When They Call Your Client a Liar, a Fraud and a Cheat.

    The defense has enlisted the aid of a hired gun “expert” who insinuates or is going to testify that your client is a malingerer or a fraud. What can you do to address such tactics? Can you exclude the testimony? Should you address it head on or skirt the issue? Hopefully, this blog will offer →

    closing arguments, Trial Advocacy, Uncategorized

    /

    analogies, Expert Witness, Motion in limine, Parables; analogies; fables; storytelling; closing arguments, Rules of evidence

    /

    Apr 1, 2014
  • Why It Doesn’t Always Pay to be the Smartest Guy in the Room

    Ego… All good trial attorneys have it.  Without a little ego it would be difficult to stand up and try to persuade a bunch of strangers you just met to acquit your client or award your client a significant sum of money.  It takes not hard work and preparation, but a fair amount of moxie →

    Trial Advocacy

    /

    ego, judges, Jury, Law, Lawyer, persuasion, Rules of evidence, strategy, trial advocacy, trial notebook

    /

    Oct 4, 2013
  • Litigation Against an Organization: Why you need to do a Rule 30(B)(6) deposition.

    If you are suing an organization, it is important that you familiarize yourself with the provisions of Rule 30(b)(6).  Rule of Procedure 30(b)(6) provides in pertinent part: Notice or Subpoena Directed to an Organization. In its notice or subpoena, a party may name as the deponent a public or private corporation, a partnership, an association, a governmental agency, or →

    depositions, Evidence

    /

    Civil procedure, Deposition, organization, Rule 30, Rules of evidence

    /

    Jun 14, 2012
  • Motion in Limine: An Effective Pretrial Tool and Weapon (Part 2)

    Here are some additional topics to consider:               Unnecessary Medical Treatment. You should preclude or prohibit the defense counsel from alleging or arguing that plaintiff’s accident-related medical expenses are unnecessary or unreasonable.  All damages directly attributable to the wrong are recoverable by the victim.  The law also typically allows an injured plaintiff to recover reasonable →

    Trial Advocacy

    /

    Evidence, Rules of evidence

    /

    Mar 15, 2012
  • Mastering the Rules of Evidence: Is it really important?

    Early in my career, the “rules” of evidence were derived by reading case-law and the handful of statutes that addressed privilege and competence. If you wanted to know the “rules”, you had to research and read case-law. The only ready compendium were books like Graham’s Handbook on Federal Evidence. Today, litigators in every state and →

    Evidence, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Case law, Evidence (law), Jury trial, Law, Lawbox, Lawyer, Legal Information, Rules of evidence, United States

    /

    Aug 12, 2011

Rich Cook has been practicing law for over 40 years and has been recognized by his peers for his contributions to the development of personal injury law and trial advocacy in the State of Indiana.

Since entering private practice, Rich has handled a wide range of matters involving claims of personal injury, wrongful death, automobile collisions, medical malpractice, product liability, job site injuries, insurance disputes, breach of contract, defamation, sexual harassment claims, civil rights claims, class actions, and construction site injuries.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
 

Loading Comments...
 

    • Subscribe Subscribed
      • The Barrister's Toolbox
      • Join 104 other subscribers
      • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
      • The Barrister's Toolbox
      • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Sign up
      • Log in
      • Report this content
      • View site in Reader
      • Manage subscriptions
      • Collapse this bar