The Barrister's Toolbox
    • About
    • Have a Question?
  • Home
  • richcooklaw.com

/

Tumblr

/

Linkedin

The Barrister’s Toolbox

Category: Jury Selection

  • Keep in Mind that Judges Are Only Human

    So often I see attorneys lose sight of the fact judges are only human. This means one has to be mindful of what you can reasonably expect of a judge. Help a judge by: 1. Making your arguments or briefs short and succinct. Get to the point. Judge’s have limited time. Don’t cite ten cases →

    Trial Advocacy, Jury Selection, dos and don’ts

    /

    advocacy, challenges for cause, Jury, Jury selection, Jury trial, Marking Exhibits, Trial, Trial Work, Voir dire

    /

    Apr 2, 2022
  • An Unforeseen Value to Loss of Consortium Claims in Selecting a Jury.

    As a Plaintiff’s attorney you want to identify jurors who will refuse to follow the Court’s instructions directing the grant of money damages for pain and suffering. I inadvertently found something that is even more polarizing and controversial than claims for such intangible losses… Loss of consortium! I was picking jury in a rural county →

    Jury Selection, Uncategorized

    /

    challenges for cause, juries, jurors, Jury, Jury selection, loss of consortium, Trial, trial advocacy, Trial Strategy, Voir dire

    /

    Dec 12, 2017
  • Polling a Jury: How to Keep Yourself Out of La La Land…

    So the clerk finishes reading the jury’s verdict and your client has just lost.  What do you do? Why read the jury rules: RULE 30. JUDGE TO READ THE VERDICT When the jury has agreed upon its verdict, the foreperson shall sign the appropriate verdict form. When returned into court, the judge shall read the →

    Jury Rules, Jury Selection

    /

    Jury Rules, La La Land, Moonlight, Polling a jury

    /

    Feb 27, 2017
  • Leaders, Loners and the Art of Jury Selection.

    Often times you cannot eliminate troublesome jurors.  This can be a real problem since developing challenges for cause against an unfavorable juror can be difficult and at times impossible. In such cases, you want to use your peremptory challenges against such persons if they will affect the outcome of your case. In federal capital cases, both →

    Jury Selection

    /

    Jury selection, leaders and loners, peremptory challenges

    /

    Jun 29, 2016
  • FAST AND DIRTY JURY SELECTION

    The time allowed for jury selection now is typically very brief compared to the time allotted to attorneys years ago when I first started practicing. I used an approach similar to the one suggested here in picking criminal juries where I had much more time to explore the qualifications of jurors and their potential biases. →

    Jury Selection

    /

    bias, Jury selection, Voir dire

    /

    Apr 17, 2016
  • Confirmation Bias: Foe of Justice and Truth

       “Confirmation Bias” has nothing to do with the Holy Spirit. It is a mindset we all are susceptible to in the way we see the world. ‘Confirmation Bias’ is a psychological phenomenon that explains why people tend to seek out information that confirms their existing opinions and overlook or ignore information that refutes their →

    experts, Jury Selection, rule 702

    /

    confirmation bias, DNA, Innocence Project, JohnGrisham, jury bias, Making a Murder, medical malpractice, Ron Williamson, Steven Avery, The Innocent Man

    /

    Jan 17, 2016
  • The Problem with Problems.

    So do you want to know what the problem is with problems? Most people are like an ostrich with its head buried in the sand in fear of what they might see.  We all have a tendency to ignore our problems and procrastinate.  This is fatal thinking or à total lack of thinking. Instead of waiting →

    closing arguments, Direct examination, dos and don’ts, Evidence, Jury Selection, mock trial, Trial Advocacy

    /

    ad hominem, Adversarial system, advocacy, analogies, Analogies anecdotes, apologies, challenges for cause, character, Closing argument, Evidence (law)

    /

    Sep 30, 2015
  • Plotting Your Strategy: Does Your Trial Have a Theme?

    ​A theme acts as the unifying thread of your case. It is a thing that motivates the jurors to take action. Your theme needs to be integrated into your jury void dire, opening statement, direct and cross-examination, closing argument and jury instructions. There are number of potential themes. Watch movies and see how things are →

    closing arguments, cross-examination, Jury Selection, mock trial, testimony, Trial Advocacy

    /

    advocacy, Closing argument, Cross-examination, Opening statement, themes

    /

    Aug 13, 2015
  • I’ve Been Called for Jury Service… What Do I Do Now?

     THOMAS JEFFERSON (1789):  “I consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.” My last blog post made me realize that potential jurors need guidance.  What is their role? What should they do if called to serve?  Jury →

    Jury Selection

    /

    jurors, Jury, jury duty, Jury service, summoned for jury duty

    /

    Jul 29, 2015
  • Empowering Jurors… Justice or Injustice: A Book Every Attorney Should Read!

    I just finished reading Justice or Injustice: What Really Happens in a Jury Room and it has some profound lessons for every trial attorney… Especially those in the criminal arena. It is a short piece of non-fiction about a juror’s participation in a capital murder case and outlines the dangers that can occur when jurors →

    closing arguments, Jury Selection, mock trial, Rules of Evidence

    /

    ad hominem, Adversarial system, advocacy, Allen Charge, David Ball, dynamite charge, hung juries, J. L. Hardee, juror rights, Jury trial, Kimberly Renee Poole, murder trial, right to trial by jury, South Carolina, Theatre Tips and Strategies for Jury Trials, what really happens in a jury room

    /

    Jul 26, 2015
  • Challenges to the Composition of the Jury Pool

    A fox should not be on the jury at a goose’s trial. – – Thomas Fuller A right to trial by jury is guaranteed under both state and federal law.   In a civil matter, a trial by jury is provided for under Article 1, Section 20 of, and the 7th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.  →

    Jury Selection, Trial Advocacy

    /

    6th Amendment, 7th Amendment, fair cross section of the community, Indiana’s Bill of Rights, jurors, Jury, jury pool, Jury trial

    /

    Nov 20, 2014
  • Use of Peremptory Challenges and Preservation of Challenges for Cause

    The great thing about our system of democracy is when they call you for jury duty, you have to come… It’s an honor and a privilege. I was called and I’ve got to be here.    – – Antonio Villaraigosa Pursuant to Indiana’s long-standing rule, a claim of error arising from the denial of a challenge →

    Jury Selection

    /

    Adversarial system, challenges for cause, error, Jury, Jury selection, Jury trial, peremptory challenges, Preservation of Challenges for Cause, waiver

    /

    Nov 13, 2014
  • Use of Peremptory Challenges and the Improper Exclusion of Juors

    Ending racial discrimination in jury selection can be accomplished only by eliminating peremptory challenges entirely.  – – Thurgood Marshall Number of Peremptory Challenges:  There’s no such thing as a free lunch and likewise, even the free strike of jurors provided by the use peremptory challenges is not its own costs and problems. However, there will be people →

    Jury Selection, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Batson v. Kentucky, Gender, jurors, Jury selection, Jury trial, Marilyn Rae Baskin V. Penny Bogan, peremptory challenges, Sexual Orientation

    /

    Nov 10, 2014
  • The Problem of Juror Bias

    “A jury verdict is the quotient of the prejudices of twelve people.” Kenneth Grubb, Attorney Anything I missed?   Juror Bias is a difficult problem that must be ferreted out by the trial attorney in almost every trial. Quite honestly, this can not be effectively done without the cooperation of the jury. I will often close my →

    Jury Selection

    /

    challenges for cause, juries, jurors, Jury selection, Jury trial, jury voir dire

    /

    Nov 5, 2014
  • Zen and the Art of Trial Advocacy

    “The moon does not fight. It attacks no one. It does not worry. It does not try to crush others. It keeps to its course, but by its very nature, it gently influences. What other body could pull an entire ocean from shore to shore? The moon is faithful to its nature and its power →

    closing arguments, cross-examination, Jury Selection, Trial Advocacy

    /

    /

    Jul 7, 2014
  • A Hung Jury: When a Stalemate Becomes Your Best Option.

    Hung juries are generally considered to be a rare outcome to a trial. However, even though it is not a true resolution, it can be considered your best outcome. Hung juries are even rarer when you are dealing with civil cases, where the only thing that you obtain is money. If you are likely to →

    Jury Selection, Trial Advocacy, Uncategorized

    /

    Hung jury, Jury nullification, Legal Stalemate, Trial Strategy

    /

    Mar 30, 2014
  • Big City Chicago Style

    Sitting in Water Tower Place I could not help but think about all the great and talented attorneys this City has produced. The legendary Clarence Darrow called this place home. He never shied away from taking on difficult cases, unpopular causes or clients. Darrow successfully defended Dr. Ossian Sweet, a black physician, who was charged →

    Jury Selection, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Chicago, Clarence Darrow, Detroit, Dr. Ossian Sweet, Hon. Frank Murphy, John Wayne, Jury selection, Voir dire

    /

    Oct 13, 2013
  • Trial Post-Mortem

    If you try cases long enough, you are going to eventually lose a few.  You need to look at losses as an opportunity to improve.   Quite honestly you should learn more from your loses, than your victories.  If your are allowed, you should speak with the jurors and see what they thought was important. →

    closing arguments, depositions, Evidence, Jury Selection, Trial Advocacy

    /

    /

    Jun 15, 2012
  • Jury selection in ten minutes or less… Can it be done effectively?

    The time allowed for jury selection today is typically very brief compared to the time allotted years ago to attorneys. One article that I recently read by Attorney Karen Koehler provided an interesting and effective approach to dealing with limited time for questioning potential jurors. This is what she said to a panel of prospective →

    Jury Selection, Trial Advocacy

    /

    /

    Jan 5, 2012
  • Jury Selection-What’s the Goal?

    Of all the areas of trial work, this is probably the most difficult and important task that confronts a courtroom attorney. I have seen many different approaches used in questioning and selecting a jury. Your time is limited and the stakes are high. If you “guess’ incorrectly you can lose your case before it even →

    Jury Selection, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Jury, Voir dire

    /

    Aug 15, 2011

Rich Cook has been practicing law for over 40 years and has been recognized by his peers for his contributions to the development of personal injury law and trial advocacy in the State of Indiana.

Since entering private practice, Rich has handled a wide range of matters involving claims of personal injury, wrongful death, automobile collisions, medical malpractice, product liability, job site injuries, insurance disputes, breach of contract, defamation, sexual harassment claims, civil rights claims, class actions, and construction site injuries.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
 

Loading Comments...
 

    • Subscribe Subscribed
      • The Barrister's Toolbox
      • Join 104 other subscribers
      • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
      • The Barrister's Toolbox
      • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Sign up
      • Log in
      • Report this content
      • View site in Reader
      • Manage subscriptions
      • Collapse this bar