The Barrister's Toolbox
    • About
    • Have a Question?
  • Home
  • richcooklaw.com

/

Tumblr

/

Linkedin

The Barrister’s Toolbox

Tag: hearsay

  • When silence is golden… The tacit admission.

    Indiana Rule of Evidence 801(A) provides: A “statement” is (1) an oral or written assertion or (2) nonverbal conduct of a person, if it is intended by the person as an assertion.A tacit admission may be made when a person remains silent or makes an equivocal response to an accusation which the person would ordinarily be expected →

    Uncategorized

    /

    admission by silence, assertions from conduct, Evidence, hearsay, rule 801, tacit admission

    /

    Jun 22, 2016
  • How to Exclude Self-Serving Reports by Testimonial Experts

    So you’re at trial and your opponent wants to offer into evidence their expert’s written report… What do you do?  Is it admissible? The short answer is no. Expert’s reports are documents prepared in anticipation of litigation and do not have the inherent reliability of documents typically considered and admissible under exceptions to the hearsay →

    Evidence, exclusion of witnesses, experts

    /

    Expert Witnesses, hearsay, reports, rule 803(6)

    /

    Nov 5, 2015
  • Shutting Off the Defense Doctor’s Flood of Misinformation

    In my last post, I discussed an analogy to deal with tactics used by your opponent to muddy the waters.  Well, the problem is you have to drag the hogs out of the spring waters and it takes time to clear matters up. What if you could keep them out of the water altogether? Have →

    Uncategorized

    /

    advocacy, Cross-examination, defense doctors, Defense Experts, Evidence, hearsay, medical records, rule 702, rule 7o3, rule 802, rule 805, rule 901

    /

    May 28, 2015
  • Non-Hearsay: Greetings, Insults, Commands and Questions With No Real Answers

    Hearsay or non-hearsay? That is the question. But how do you identify statements that are potentially hearsay? On a local list serve experienced trial attorneys debated whether a “command” from a doctor to a patient was hearsay or not. Surprisingly, the opinions on this issue were pretty evenly split even though the answer was clear →

    Evidence

    /

    federal rule of evidence 801, greetings, hearsay, imperative statements, implied assertions from conduct, interrogatory statements, non-hearsay

    /

    Oct 4, 2013

Rich Cook has been practicing law for over 40 years and has been recognized by his peers for his contributions to the development of personal injury law and trial advocacy in the State of Indiana.

Since entering private practice, Rich has handled a wide range of matters involving claims of personal injury, wrongful death, automobile collisions, medical malpractice, product liability, job site injuries, insurance disputes, breach of contract, defamation, sexual harassment claims, civil rights claims, class actions, and construction site injuries.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
 

Loading Comments...
 

    • Subscribe Subscribed
      • The Barrister's Toolbox
      • Join 104 other subscribers
      • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
      • The Barrister's Toolbox
      • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Sign up
      • Log in
      • Report this content
      • View site in Reader
      • Manage subscriptions
      • Collapse this bar