The Barrister's Toolbox
    • About
    • Have a Question?
  • Home
  • richcooklaw.com

/

Tumblr

/

Linkedin

The Barrister’s Toolbox

Tag: Adversarial system

  • The Floor for the Value of a Human Life is Flying High

     You have a wrongful death claim and need an indisputable source of information to determine the minimum value of a human life.  Wouldn’t it be nice if the federal government published minimum values for the loss of a human life? Well, they have! The U.S. Defense Department has made a conscious decision on this very disputed →

    closing arguments, Trial Advocacy, Uncategorized

    /

    Adversarial system, catastrophic injuries, juries, Parables; analogies; fables; storytelling; closing arguments, total disability, Trial, trial advocacy, wrongful death

    /

    Nov 9, 2017
  • The Case Against Experts in the Courtroom

    “If you can’t explain it to a six year old, you don’t understand it yourself.” Albert Einstein I have always thought it is unclear whether Indiana Rule of Evidence (IRE) 615 applies to depositions. IRE 101(C) states: Rules Inapplicable. The rules, other than those with respect to privileges, do not apply in the following situations: →

    depositions, Evidence, exclusion of witnesses, experts, rule 101, Rule 102, Rule 26, Rule 30, Rule 32, Rule 43, Rule 615, rule 702, Rule 704, Rules of Evidence, separation of witnesses, testimony, Trial Advocacy, Trial Rules

    /

    Adversarial system, Civil procedure

    /

    Oct 15, 2015
  • The Problem with Problems.

    So do you want to know what the problem is with problems? Most people are like an ostrich with its head buried in the sand in fear of what they might see.  We all have a tendency to ignore our problems and procrastinate.  This is fatal thinking or à total lack of thinking. Instead of waiting →

    closing arguments, Direct examination, dos and don’ts, Evidence, Jury Selection, mock trial, Trial Advocacy

    /

    ad hominem, Adversarial system, advocacy, analogies, Analogies anecdotes, apologies, challenges for cause, character, Closing argument, Evidence (law)

    /

    Sep 30, 2015
  • Closing Argument – Save Your Zingers for Rebuttal!

    If you are the plaintiff or the state prosecutor in a criminal case, you have the advantage of going last. However, remember that the scope of rebuttal is determined by the issues addressed in the closing argument of opposing counsel. When I was a law clerk right out of school, I saw team of attorneys →

    closing arguments, mock trial

    /

    Adversarial system, advocacy, Closing argument, Rebuttal Argument

    /

    Sep 18, 2015
  • Closing Argument – Taking the Wind Out of the Other Side’s Sails before They Leave the Dock

    ​It is important to stick with the argument that you’ve planned out and then aggressively and positively put forward your case. You don’t want to waste too much time responding to the other side’s argument to the detriment of their own. You want to help the jurors reach their own conclusions about the case through →

    Uncategorized

    /

    Adversarial system, advocacy, Closing argument, credibility

    /

    Sep 18, 2015
  • The Barrister’s Toolbox will hit 50,000 Views today… Now What?

    Today my blog will have 50,000 views for the over 107 posts I have authored on a number of topics that confronts today’s trial advocate.  My most read topic is about how to handle a deposition errata sheet. I find that quite surprising.  A young attorney from New York called to thank me for the post and →

    Uncategorized

    /

    Adversarial system, advice for the trial Attorney, advocacy, credibility

    /

    Sep 13, 2015
  • Closing Argument: Begin Strong, End Stronger and Sock It to Them!

    As far as I am concerned, when it comes to your closing argument, you want to begin strong and end strong. You are the director, producer and central author of the closing argument. Syd Field is the author of a number of books on screenwriting. His principles have equal application to the formulation of a closing →

    Uncategorized

    /

    Adversarial system, advocacy, analogies, Analogies anecdotes, analogy, Closing argument, Gerry Spence

    /

    Sep 4, 2015
  • Outlining Your Questions… Is There a Better Way?

    Exactly how do you want to format your questions? There are several schools of thought on this matter. I know successful attorneys that literally script out every question and every answer to the question. In this way, the attorney can visualize exactly what will take place in the courtroom. Such a format also allows someone →

    cross-examination, Direct examination, mock trial, testimony, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Adversarial system, advocacy, testimony

    /

    Aug 24, 2015
  • Lights, Camera, Action: Directing and Producing Your Trial

    You are the “director” and “producer” of your trial and the witness’s testimony. We can’t change the facts, but you do have the power of when and how to present them subject to the limits of the Rules of Evidence. Indiana Rule of Evidence 611 controls the manner and mode of interrogation of witnesses. This →

    Evidence, mock trial, testimony, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Adversarial system, advocacy, direct examination

    /

    Aug 1, 2015
  • Empowering Jurors… Justice or Injustice: A Book Every Attorney Should Read!

    I just finished reading Justice or Injustice: What Really Happens in a Jury Room and it has some profound lessons for every trial attorney… Especially those in the criminal arena. It is a short piece of non-fiction about a juror’s participation in a capital murder case and outlines the dangers that can occur when jurors →

    closing arguments, Jury Selection, mock trial, Rules of Evidence

    /

    ad hominem, Adversarial system, advocacy, Allen Charge, David Ball, dynamite charge, hung juries, J. L. Hardee, juror rights, Jury trial, Kimberly Renee Poole, murder trial, right to trial by jury, South Carolina, Theatre Tips and Strategies for Jury Trials, what really happens in a jury room

    /

    Jul 26, 2015
  • Helping Your Client Connect with the Jury

    The more significant a witness is to your case, the more important it often is to let the jury know exactly who they are. Usually, your client is one of the most important witnesses the jury will hear from during the course of trial. When dealing with such witnesses, I will generally cover age, where →

    testimony, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Adversarial system, direct examination, Trial, witness preparation

    /

    Jul 15, 2015
  • The Million Dollar Question: How Much Should I Ask For?

    There is no set rule.  I would recommend that you play it by ear. If you have a case that is clearly worth a good deal of money, give the jury guidance as to how you calculated damages by breaking down each separate category covered in the jury instruction on damages and assigning a number to it. →

    closing arguments, mock trial, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Adversarial system, advocacy, Closing argument

    /

    Jun 30, 2015
  • Use of Peremptory Challenges and Preservation of Challenges for Cause

    The great thing about our system of democracy is when they call you for jury duty, you have to come… It’s an honor and a privilege. I was called and I’ve got to be here.    – – Antonio Villaraigosa Pursuant to Indiana’s long-standing rule, a claim of error arising from the denial of a challenge →

    Jury Selection

    /

    Adversarial system, challenges for cause, error, Jury, Jury selection, Jury trial, peremptory challenges, Preservation of Challenges for Cause, waiver

    /

    Nov 13, 2014
  • Greetings Trial Lawyers – Need Help? – Give Me a Call.

    This site is for those who practice in our nation’s courtrooms and make our adversarial system an engine for justice. All are welcome to share their knowledge and experience about what works in communicating with judges and juries.  Have a question that requires in-depth consultation for a case you are handling?  Please feel free to contact me.  I can  →

    Trial Advocacy

    /

    Adversarial system, jury selection consulting services, Law, Lawyer, legal consulting services, Litigant in person, strategic consulting services

    /

    Aug 8, 2011

Rich Cook has been practicing law for over 40 years and has been recognized by his peers for his contributions to the development of personal injury law and trial advocacy in the State of Indiana.

Since entering private practice, Rich has handled a wide range of matters involving claims of personal injury, wrongful death, automobile collisions, medical malpractice, product liability, job site injuries, insurance disputes, breach of contract, defamation, sexual harassment claims, civil rights claims, class actions, and construction site injuries.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
 

Loading Comments...
 

    • Subscribe Subscribed
      • The Barrister's Toolbox
      • Join 104 other subscribers
      • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
      • The Barrister's Toolbox
      • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Sign up
      • Log in
      • Report this content
      • View site in Reader
      • Manage subscriptions
      • Collapse this bar