The Barrister's Toolbox
    • About
    • Have a Question?
  • Home
  • richcooklaw.com

/

Tumblr

/

Linkedin

The Barrister’s Toolbox

Category: cross-examination

  • Impeccable Impeachment and the Use of Prior Convictions

    “Trust is not simply a matter of truthfulness, or even constancy. It is also a matter of amity and goodwill. We trust those who have our best interests at heart, and mistrust those who seem deaf to our concerns.”   Gary Hamel What are the limitations on the use of prior convictions in challenging a witness’s →

    cross-examination, dos and don’ts, Evidence, rule 403, Rules of Evidence, Uncategorized

    /

    impeachment, Juvenile Convictions, Opening the door, prior convictions, rule 403, Rule 609, Rules of evidence

    /

    Sep 26, 2017
  • Outlining Your Questions… Is There a Better Way?

    Exactly how do you want to format your questions? There are several schools of thought on this matter. I know successful attorneys that literally script out every question and every answer to the question. In this way, the attorney can visualize exactly what will take place in the courtroom. Such a format also allows someone →

    cross-examination, Direct examination, mock trial, testimony, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Adversarial system, advocacy, testimony

    /

    Aug 24, 2015
  • Plotting Your Strategy: Does Your Trial Have a Theme?

    ​A theme acts as the unifying thread of your case. It is a thing that motivates the jurors to take action. Your theme needs to be integrated into your jury void dire, opening statement, direct and cross-examination, closing argument and jury instructions. There are number of potential themes. Watch movies and see how things are →

    closing arguments, cross-examination, Jury Selection, mock trial, testimony, Trial Advocacy

    /

    advocacy, Closing argument, Cross-examination, Opening statement, themes

    /

    Aug 13, 2015
  • Looking Good and the Art of Cross-Examination

    Cross-examination is the greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth. You can do anything with a bayonet except sit on it. A lawyer can do anything with cross-examination if he is skillful enough not to impale his own cause upon it.  – John Henry Wigmore There are a number strategies out there regarding →

    cross-examination, Trial Advocacy, Uncategorized

    /

    Art of Cross Examination, Cross-examination, MacCarthy on Cross-Examination

    /

    Dec 1, 2014
  • Zen and the Art of Trial Advocacy

    “The moon does not fight. It attacks no one. It does not worry. It does not try to crush others. It keeps to its course, but by its very nature, it gently influences. What other body could pull an entire ocean from shore to shore? The moon is faithful to its nature and its power →

    closing arguments, cross-examination, Jury Selection, Trial Advocacy

    /

    /

    Jul 7, 2014
  • Strategies for the Cross-Examination of Experts

    In my last post, I discussed what a trial attorney can do to prepare for the cross-examination of an adverse expert. Below are some strategies that can be used in successfully cross-examining an adverse expert witness: 1. Favorable Evidence: One tactic that should not be ignored is using the opposing party’s expert to concede to →

    cross-examination, depositions, Evidence, Trial Advocacy

    /

    /

    Mar 7, 2012
  • Cross-Examination of Experts: Where to Start.

    Where do you start with your preparation to cross-examine an expert? The following is a list of areas to review: 1. The Expert’s Curriculum Vita: You should thoroughly review the expert’s c.v. Expert’s will exaggerate and even make up credentials. In a criminal case I was defending the State’s expert, an environmental specialist, claimed he →

    cross-examination, depositions, Evidence, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Cross-examination, Expert Witness

    /

    Feb 27, 2012
  • The Greatest Rule of Cross Examination – Always ask a leading question!

    Alright you are getting ready to do your first cross-examination and you wonder what is the most important rule to being successful? It is simply this “Always ask leading questions that provide information supportive of you case.” You ask, “How can that be?” That’s too simple! The rule is easy to announce, but it is →

    cross-examination

    /

    Cross-examination; Frank Oliver; leading questions

    /

    Feb 11, 2012
  • Cross Examination: Why Pigs Get Fat & Hogs Get Slaughtered

    Cross-examination is often considered by many to be an art. When it comes to strategy, sometimes all you need is a little common sense. We all have heard the old saying, “Pigs get fat and hogs get slaughtered”, but what’s that got to do with cross-examination? Greed can be a vice and a weakness even →

    cross-examination, Trial Advocacy

    /

    /

    Jan 31, 2012
  • Zingers: The power of the “one-liner” in communicating with jurors

    There is nothing more powerful in terms of capturing someone’s attention and imbedding your message in their brain than a good one-liner or as I like to call them, a “zinger”. A “zinger” is described as “a surprising or unusually pointed or telling remark.” In today’s modern fast paced world, speechwriters and politicians often work →

    cross-examination, Trial Advocacy

    /

    /

    Jan 24, 2012
  • When is the “Truth” Wrong?

    When is the truth wrong? This issue comes up often during the course of a trial. A witness testifies to a fact which is contrary to your side of the case, or it contradicts other evidence. A question arises, is the witness being truthful? Why is he “lying”? The more important question to ask is: →

    cross-examination, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Cross-examination; lying; truth

    /

    Aug 31, 2011
  • The Silent Cross-Examination… When nothing is better.

    Nothing is more thrilling than conducting a good cross-examination of an adverse witness. The attorney through a series of leading questions wrangles  concessions and makes his own case through a line of short and concise rhetorical questions that lead to an undeniable conclusion in favor of one’s client.  However, there are times when no cross-examination is the best course of →

    cross-examination, Evidence, Trial Advocacy

    /

    Art of Cross Examination, Cross-examination, Law

    /

    Aug 17, 2011

Rich Cook has been practicing law for over 40 years and has been recognized by his peers for his contributions to the development of personal injury law and trial advocacy in the State of Indiana.

Since entering private practice, Rich has handled a wide range of matters involving claims of personal injury, wrongful death, automobile collisions, medical malpractice, product liability, job site injuries, insurance disputes, breach of contract, defamation, sexual harassment claims, civil rights claims, class actions, and construction site injuries.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
 

Loading Comments...
 

    • Subscribe Subscribed
      • The Barrister's Toolbox
      • Join 104 other subscribers
      • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
      • The Barrister's Toolbox
      • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Sign up
      • Log in
      • Report this content
      • View site in Reader
      • Manage subscriptions
      • Collapse this bar