-
Keep in Mind that Judges Are Only Human
So often I see attorneys lose sight of the fact judges are only human. This means one has to be mindful of what you can reasonably expect of a judge. Help a judge by: 1. Making your arguments or briefs short and succinct. Get to the point. Judge’s have limited time. Don’t cite ten cases →
-
Deposition of a Party or Witness and the Power of Dignified Demeanor
Remind your client or witness of their freedom to choose their attitude and the power they have to control their demeanor. This advice will empower and cut short abusive questioning at trial or during a deposition. →
-
The Floor for the Value of a Human Life is Flying High
You have a wrongful death claim and need an indisputable source of information to determine the minimum value of a human life. Wouldn’t it be nice if the federal government published minimum values for the loss of a human life? Well, they have! The U.S. Defense Department has made a conscious decision on this very disputed →
-
Why Sorry is the Badest Word…
An expression of regret or an apology by a Defendant is nothing new when a case doesn’t settle and finally makes it to trial. However, should this be allowed? Why no! Defendants should be prohibited from expressing any apologies or statements of regret to the jury in connection with a civil case not seeking punitive →
-
Impeccable Impeachment and the Use of Prior Convictions
“Trust is not simply a matter of truthfulness, or even constancy. It is also a matter of amity and goodwill. We trust those who have our best interests at heart, and mistrust those who seem deaf to our concerns.” Gary Hamel What are the limitations on the use of prior convictions in challenging a witness’s →
-
Limiting the Damage
So you lose an evidentiary argument and the court allows some potentially prejudicial evidence to be presented for some narrow purpose such as bias, impeachment or to show intent, similar plan, motive or scheme. So what should you do? Indiana follows “the rule of multiple admissibility” endorsed by the evidence treatises of both Whitmore →
-
The Corrosive Effects of Greed on Credibility
“Don’t take a good case, try to make it a great case, and turn it into a bad case.” Richard Cook I never take on a new client without sharing the quote above with them. The most valuable component of any personal injury case is the client’s credibility… period, end of case. If you →
-
Getting Your Expert Ready for Court – How to Play the Course and Avoid the Rough.
What does an Expert Witness Needs to Know About Court Proceedings? Here are some thoughts to keep you expert out of the rough: 1. Review all evidentiary foundations. You should review the appropriate foundational requirements for the admission of any records, tests, or other analysis which is not stipulated to by the opposing party. →
-
Expert Witness Reports – Avoiding Litigation Sand Traps – What They Should and Should Not Include
You have hired an expert and are in need of a report or findings for you expert disclosures. What do you do? Here is a short checklist of things to consider: 1. Compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. This probably is a good place to start. The Rule provides in pertinent part →
-
Top Mistakes in Choosing Experts
Here they are… 1. Hiring an expert too late. Experts can be helpful and sometimes essential in properly investigating and evaluating a case. They can provide guidance in drafting discovery requests and determining whether information has been overlooked, withheld or lost. They are also invaluable in assisting in deposition preparation and questioning of the →
-
Screen Your Expert and Treat Your Case Right by Avoiding Any Big Tricks…
An area which is often overlooked is screening your expert. This is important. Treat it like you would a major purchase, because it is. (a) Review and verify Curriculum Vitae. You can devastate an expert if he lies on his CV. I have done this before with experts who had a long history of →
-
Setting the Table for Admitting Your Expert’s Testimony.
To serve your expert’s testimony up to a jury you must consider and establish the following: 1. Qualifications. You need to know precisely what you are using your expert for, and then determine if the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier-of-fact to understand the evidence or to determine a particular →
-
Proper Objections at Your Expert’s Deposition
Palais de justice historique de Lyon, France Objections should be kept to a minimum. The Rules contemplate that objections should be concise and afford the examiner the opportunity to cure the objection. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(c)(2) (noting that “objection[s] must be stated concisely”); id., Advisory Committee Notes (1993 Amendments) (noting that “[d]epositions →
-
Expert Witness Retainer Agreements – Striking the Right Deal.
Here are points to consider: 1. Cannot be a contingent fee arrangement. This is unethical and would be disastrous regardless… enough said. 2. Cost of initial consultation. This should be free or nominal, but make sure this is clear. 3. Definition of scope of work. This should be set out in the initial engagement letter →
-
Motion in Limine: An Effective Pretrial Tool and Weapon – Wrongful Death & Remarriage (Part 6)
The defense oftentimes wants to muddy the waters and misdirect or sway the jury away from a person’s cause with information that is irrelevant or unfairly prejudicial. Wrongful death cases are no exception and remarriage is one of those topics. Fortunately, Indiana court’s have joined the majority of jurisdictions which have prohibited such tactics by →
-
The Case Against Experts in the Courtroom
“If you can’t explain it to a six year old, you don’t understand it yourself.” Albert Einstein I have always thought it is unclear whether Indiana Rule of Evidence (IRE) 615 applies to depositions. IRE 101(C) states: Rules Inapplicable. The rules, other than those with respect to privileges, do not apply in the following situations: →
-
When a Negative Becomes a Positive
Absence makes the.heart grow fonder and can also act as proof positive in a case of “missing” evidence or documents. First, there are two noted exceptions to the hearsay rule for the absence of a record. Indiana Rule of Evidence 803 has two subdivisions that deal with the admissibility: 803. Hearsay Exceptions: Availability of Declarant →
-
Outlining Your Questions… Is There a Better Way?
Exactly how do you want to format your questions? There are several schools of thought on this matter. I know successful attorneys that literally script out every question and every answer to the question. In this way, the attorney can visualize exactly what will take place in the courtroom. Such a format also allows someone →
/
Tumblr
/
The Barrister's Toolbox 