The Barrister's Toolbox
    • About
    • Have a Question?
  • Home
  • richcooklaw.com

/

Tumblr

/

Linkedin

The Barrister’s Toolbox

Tag: Motion in limine

  • Calling Out Meaningless Expert Disclosures in Medical Malpractice Cases

    The defendant doctor’s style of disclosure is almost always generic in nature and could be used in virtually any case of medical malpractice (i.e. all care provided by Dr. “X” was within the appropriate standard of care and was not a factor in the outcome). No meaningful expert disclosures are made revealing the grounds and →

    Uncategorized

    /

    Discovery, expert disclosures, Expert Witness, medical malpractice, Motion in limine, Rule 26(e)

    /

    Nov 14, 2021
  • Why Sorry is the Badest Word…

    An expression of regret or an apology by a Defendant is nothing new when a case doesn’t settle and finally makes it to trial.  However, should this be allowed?  Why no!  Defendants should be prohibited from expressing any apologies or statements of regret to the jury in connection with a civil case not seeking punitive →

    Evidence, mock trial, rule 403, Rules of Evidence, Trial Advocacy, Uncategorized

    /

    apologies, bias, Evidence, juries, Motion in limine, problems, rule 403, Trial, trial advocacy

    /

    Oct 11, 2017
  • Limiting the Damage

    So you lose an evidentiary argument and the court allows some potentially prejudicial evidence to be presented for some narrow purpose such as bias, impeachment or to show intent, similar plan, motive or scheme.  So what should you do?   Indiana follows “the rule of multiple admissibility” endorsed by the evidence treatises of both Whitmore →

    Evidence, exclusion of witnesses, Rule 105, rule 403, Rules of Evidence, Trial Advocacy, Uncategorized

    /

    Evidence, Federal Rules of Evidence, juries, jurors, Motion in limine, Rules of evidence, Trial, trial advocacy, Trial Strategy

    /

    Jun 28, 2017
  • What to Do When They Call Your Client a Liar, a Fraud and a Cheat.

    The defense has enlisted the aid of a hired gun “expert” who insinuates or is going to testify that your client is a malingerer or a fraud. What can you do to address such tactics? Can you exclude the testimony? Should you address it head on or skirt the issue? Hopefully, this blog will offer →

    closing arguments, Trial Advocacy, Uncategorized

    /

    analogies, Expert Witness, Motion in limine, Parables; analogies; fables; storytelling; closing arguments, Rules of evidence

    /

    Apr 1, 2014
  • Motion in Limine: An Effective Pretrial Tool and Weapon (Part 5)

    Here are a few additional topics to cover in your motion in limine to keep red herrings from finding their way into your case: EXPRESSION OF REGRET OR APOLOGY BY DEFENDANTS Defendants should be prohibited from expressing any apologies or statements of regret to the jury in connection with the above-referenced matter, as whether one →

    Trial Advocacy

    /

    apologies, Mitigation of damages, Motion in limine, write-offs

    /

    Sep 13, 2013
  • Motion in Limine: An Effective Pretrial Tool and Weapon (Part 3)

    A “red herring” is normally used by people to divert the attention of others from something important; from the central point that is being considered. A “herring” is a kind of fish that turns red only when it is “cured” – that is, when it is smoked and salted. Such a fish emits a very strong smell and in the →

    Trial Advocacy

    /

    Motion in limine, Red Herrings

    /

    Mar 16, 2012
  • Motion in Limine: An Effective Pretrial Tool and Weapon (Part 1)

    I plan on writing a series of posts dealing with motions in limine and the topics you may wish to cover. A Motion in Limine is a motion made for a protective order against prejudicial questions and statements, which if heard by the finder of fact, would prevent a fair and impartial trial.  The focal →

    Uncategorized

    /

    Expert Witness, Expert Witnesses, Federal Rules of Evidence, Motion in limine

    /

    Mar 14, 2012

Rich Cook has been practicing law for over 40 years and has been recognized by his peers for his contributions to the development of personal injury law and trial advocacy in the State of Indiana.

Since entering private practice, Rich has handled a wide range of matters involving claims of personal injury, wrongful death, automobile collisions, medical malpractice, product liability, job site injuries, insurance disputes, breach of contract, defamation, sexual harassment claims, civil rights claims, class actions, and construction site injuries.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
 

Loading Comments...
 

    • Subscribe Subscribed
      • The Barrister's Toolbox
      • Join 104 other subscribers
      • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
      • The Barrister's Toolbox
      • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Sign up
      • Log in
      • Report this content
      • View site in Reader
      • Manage subscriptions
      • Collapse this bar